Private Group Email for Volunteers, Communities & Teams | EMail Parrot

For Families

EMail Parrot keeps families protected from spam, phishing, viruses, and grandma’s errant clicks.

For Communities

Neighborhoods, churches, PTAs, etc. can converse without exposing personal information like name, address and email.

For Volunteers

Volunteer groups can communicate while committing to complete privacy for contact information. Using a fully anonymizing email service can reduce reluctance to signing up.

For Activists

Activists need protection from group spies, moles, and doxxing. Anonymous group email creates information compartmentalization that other messaging systems cannot.

For Businesses

Having interactive email discussions with your customers or creating email virtual focus groups provides insight and greater engagement.

For Everyone

EMail Parrot provides secure, safe & private email lists with administrative ease.

The Three Dangers of Group Email

Joining a group should not cost you your safety, your privacy, or your identity.

Comparison of group email tools across safety, privacy, and identity. Google Groups, Mailman, Groups.io, and Gaggle Mail each fail at least one; EMail Parrot protects all three.

See the full comparison

Testimonials

We have enabled many types of groups to improve their email safety and privacy. Here’s what some have to say about us …

Ready to start safe email?

Create an account and your own email distribution.

Create Account

From our blog

Stay up to date on email security and privacy threats and how EMail Parrot™ can help you stay safe

Changing Your Email Tells Them Who You Became

By William Weiner on August 4, 2026

The two earlier posts in this series – The Cookie That Never Expires and What 1,500 Emails Reveal About Tracking – described how a hashed email address became the ad industry’s favorite way to connect you across companies, and then showed that happening in one person’s real mail. This post looks at the same problem from the other side: what happens when you try to get out from under it.

You switch to an email aliasing service. Over the next few weeks you work through every account you have and swap the old address for a fresh alias – the bank, the airline, the pharmacy, the streaming service, fifty places in all. It feels like real work, and it is. When you finish, you feel unlinked: the old address is retired, the new ones are scattered across dozens of services, and nothing ties them together but a list only you can see.

Continue reading

The Loophole CNIL Left Open

By William Weiner on July 20, 2026

The guidance this blog covered earlier in July treats an email tracking pixel like a cookie and requires consent for it in most cases. It also carves out an exemption for one specific use: measuring whether an email was opened, for the narrow purpose of keeping a mailing list’s deliverability healthy. That exemption is real, and read in full it is narrower than most summaries of it suggest. It is also written loosely enough, in one specific place, that a sender inclined to stretch it has room to do so. This post is about that one place, and about how it should eventually be closed.

Continue reading

What 1,500 Emails Reveal About Tracking

By William Weiner on July 15, 2026

The earlier posts on this blog – The Cookie That Never Expires and UID2: The Standard That Replaced the Cookie – made an argument about how the ad industry replaced the cookie with your email address. This post is not an argument. It is what happened when that argument got pointed at one person’s actual mail.

The corpus is two personal mailboxes, a handful of single-service aliases, and a script that never once touches the network – it only reads what senders already embedded in the message. What came back is a specific, traceable answer to the industry’s favorite defense, that tracking pixels are harmless aggregate telemetry counting opens. The mail says otherwise, and it says something stranger besides.

Continue reading

France and Italy Just Turned Email Tracking Pixels Into a Consent Problem

By William Weiner on July 9, 2026

In the spring of 2026, two of Europe’s most active data protection regulators reached the same conclusion within weeks of each other, without coordinating on it: an invisible pixel that reports when you opened an email is not meaningfully different from a cookie, and it needs the same consent.

The pixel did not change. The law around it did.

Consent risk you didn’t sign up for is still risk. EMail Parrot removes it at the source instead of asking you to manage it.

Continue reading